For those who just finished high school and are starting university in September, here is some homework to complete over the summer. It’s specifically for those starting Waterloo Engineering, but might be useful for other programs and universities too. It’s not compulsory, and you won’t get any marks for it. But if you do it, you’ll find yourself ahead of the class and much less stressed in September/October and beyond. Continue reading
We typically get a few questions each year about our failure rate. I’m never quite sure why people ask, or what they are expecting. Do they want to hear that the failure rate is high, so they are convinced it’s a tough (and therefore good) program? Or maybe they don’t want the failure rate to be high, because they are concerned that they won’t be successful? I’m not sure what the motivation for the question is, but anyways let’s examine failure rates. Continue reading
My colleague Dana pointed out this nice little video promoting the teaching and learning of coding (i.e. programming) What Most Schools Don’t Teach . While it seems to be aimed at elementary or secondary school, I can appreciate the sentiment.
It’s not that everyone should be an expert in C++ or whatever. The idea I like is that learning coding or programming develops problem solving and logic skills. the ability to think in terms of algorithms, with inputs, outputs, loops, counters, etc. Even if you never need to code again, that is a useful learning process. Continue reading
The online application centre recently opened for our Fall 2013 intake, and we have almost 200 applicants already! Like all of our applicants, they had to make that tough first decision: which engineering program should I apply to? That’s because Waterloo does not have a general first year. The curriculum is discipline-specific right from the first day of classes.
The reason for this lack of a general first year is simple. All of our programs are based on the co-operative education model (experiential learning), where you alternate between on-campus academic learning, and paid employment where you learn the practical aspects of engineering and business. This starts in first year, so to make it work effectively you need to know where your career interests probably lie. This doesn’t mean you’re locked into something forever, but you need a starting point at least .
There are a few other advantages of starting in your program right away: 1) the people you meet will be your classmates for the rest of your program (and potential study partners, roommates, etc.); 2) your courses can be flavoured for your discipline, even if it’s a common course like calculus; 3) there’s no need to worry about competing for limited space in popular programs for 2nd year.
The downside of course, is that you have to do some upfront work before applying to Waterloo and decide which program most likely matches your interests. For some people, they’ve known this for years and this is easy, but for others it’s a struggle. So, for those people consider this to be your first Waterloo engineering homework assignment.
To help applicants out with this homework, our Management Engineering students created an online quiz a few years ago. This quiz was developed based on an extensive survey of our current students, using data mining and regression analysis techniques they learned in class. It can be accessed at this website. Based on your answers, it gives 3 possible choices for a program that might best fit your interests. It’s not perfect of course, and you might not have any interest in some of the suggestions. But it can be quite useful for identifying programs that maybe you hadn’t thought about before. So, it’s sort of a screening tool to help narrow down your search a bit.
Once you identify a few programs of possible interest, you’ll have to do some further research. A web search can be helpful, but here are a couple of sites that seem to have good information: http://www.tryengineering.org/become.php?page=majors_eng and http://www.egfi-k12.org/engineer-your-path/ The more you read, the easier it will be to find some examples of careers and programs that seem like the best fit. Other information sources include: family friends or employers, visiting Waterloo or your local university and speaking to students and faculty, or possibly a teacher in your high school studied engineering.
If after going through all this you’re still ambivalent about the choices, there are lots of other universities with general first year engineering programs. You can postpone your decision for another year by going there.
What if you start a program at Waterloo and then want to change your mind? That happens, and we do our best to accommodate changes. But we usually find that after going through this homework exercise, the vast majority of students are happy with their choice (probably 98%+). So it seems that most people get the “right answer” when they do the homework.
Classes will be starting shortly, and this is the time when new students typically get some advice for their future studies. If you search around the web, you’ll find lots of blogs, books, forums, and pages with suggestions for how to succeed in university and engineering programs. Rather than add one more, I think I’ll provide the following list for students who want to fail out and toss away the $10,000 (or more) it cost in tuition and living expenses to attend for a term. These suggestions are based on many years of observation as an academic advisor dealing with failed-out students, so they’re guaranteed to work! They are somewhat specific to Waterloo Engineering, but I bet that many will work for other programs too. Continue reading
Admission to our Engineering programs requires the completion of certain Grade 12 courses (or equivalents in various other school systems), specifically Functions, Calculus, English, Chemistry and Physics in Ontario. For many years we have discouraged the idea of re-taking any of these required courses to boost marks and get a competitive edge for admission. In recent years, this has taken the form of a penalty of around 5% points off the overall average of the required courses if one or more are repeated (the higher grade is used). The net effect is that unless the repeated course(s) add at least another 30 percentage points to the total, repeating a course is not worthwhile for competitive advantage in admissions. In many cases, repeating course(s) will knock the application out of the competition completely. Other universities seem to have a range of approaches, from accepting repeats without question to ignoring the improved grade completely. So, we’re somewhere in between. But why use this penalty approach? Continue reading