- 294,287 hits
Most Viewed Posts & Pages
It’s been quite a while since I’ve even looked at this blog, due to time issues I’ll describe below. But a new admission cycle is gearing up, so I’ll try to keep up with it again. I see quite a few comments awaiting moderation and response, and frankly I probably can’t catch up with those and many are probably “stale” now anyway. So I’m going to delete those waiting comments and start fresh (sorry if you had a recent comment; just post it again).
When people discover that I’m a professor, they sometimes ask in April or May about my plans for the summer, perhaps thinking that we get the summer off like high school teachers. However, that’s not the case and professors in Canada are usually expected to work 12 months per year (unlike the U.S. where professors often hold 9 month appointments). Of course, we do get some vacation time but not the entire summer. Actually, because of our co-op structure, quite a few of my colleagues teach courses during the summer, so Waterloo never really slows down much.
Here’s my version of that old school essay we would have to do each year, “what I did during my summer”: Continue reading
Here’s an updated re-post from 2013, which might be useful.
When people apply to Waterloo Engineering, they apply to the program of most interest but can also identify a second and third choice on their AIF. That way, if they are not quite competitive for the 1st choice, we can still consider them for one of the other two. We assume that the choices are ranked in descending order of preference, so we try to get the 2nd choice if possible, then the 3rd. Typically around 300 to 350 people get one of these alternate offers to their 2nd or 3rd choice (not a target, just a typical number each year). Some people are quite happy with their alternate offer. Others, not so much. Those holding an alternate offer will have to decide what to do with it, so here are a few questions that commonly come up. Continue reading
I realize now that I’ve never written much about our wait list processes, so this is probably a good time to do that. Our wait list operation depends a bit on the specific circumstances, so I’ll try to explain it along the lines of several common scenarios. Continue reading
After many hours of review and work by the admissions team, the final set of admissions decisions are done. I’ll just summarize a few things for now.
- Offers are being posted to Quest initially, and will get updated on OUAC in the next few days. Ontario (OUAC 101) offers come out first (like today), and out of province (OUAC 105) offers take a few more days to process, so probably by the end of this week.
- Emails should go out shortly too (I think). Mailed packages take a bit more time to assemble and deliver.
- As we suspected, competition for the limited number of spaces was higher again this year, about 1,000 more applications than last year. At the end, we received a bit over 10,000 applications, and made about 3,000 offers. This should give us about 1,600 new students in September, which is our target. On the downside, there will be about 7,000 disappointed applicants.
- At first glance, it seems that the increased competition pushed up the typical admission averages by about 1% across all the programs. We will have to update our admission stats for the 2015 cycle in the coming weeks.
- Some people will call the office to find out why they didn’t get an offer, or didn’t get their first choice program. It’s a bit pointless however, since the answer is always the same…in the ranked list of applicants, the program was filled before we got down to that part of the list. In many programs we were filling the last few spots with applicants having low 90s averages, and there were still 500+ applicants left in the list.
- We will have a waitlist for those who want to be reconsidered in June if there are any open spaces. You can ask to be put on the waitlist by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org with your name, ID# and desired program.
- I see that there are dozens of comments on other posts that I haven’t had time to address. Sorry, but I’ll have to delete most of them and start fresh, unless they are key questions of general interest.
Things continue to be extremely busy, so many of my planned posts are postponed. Here are a few random comments that might be of interest.
- In late March we sent out a couple of hundred more offers to applicants from outside of Ontario. By our estimates, most programs have now committed 40 to 50% of the available spaces. We will give these remaining spaces away in the final round in early May.
- Currently, we’re waiting for the Ontario schools’ second semester mid-term grades to be uploaded. And we’re frantically working through the remaining document submissions from the non-Ontario applicants. Everything should be done by late April so we can do the early May offers.
- As soon as the early May offers are finalized, we will also make the scholarship decisions for all the offer holders (including those from the earlier rounds).
- Final application numbers are in, and it looks like we had a record number of applicants again this year. Over 10,000 in total, for about 1,600 available spots.
- While scanning through some data, I noticed that one applicant had ranked Waterloo Engineering as #31 on OUAC (this might be a record in my experience). As I have posted in the past, we don’t really care what ranking an applicant puts us as; if the grades are competitive we will make an offer. But I have to wonder about people who are applying to so many programs (and spending so much money for the applications!). And this is not an isolated case; there are a bunch that rank us in the 20s. Surely they could be a bit more strategic and selective about their applications? When I was in high school (a long time ago, admittedly), we were only allowed to apply to a maximum of 3 programs.
- The AIF reading and scoring is pretty much done now. Every year there are a bunch of applicants who didn’t press “Submit” for every part of the AIF (in spite of email reminders), so it doesn’t get read and scored because it’s not fully completed. Unfortunately they won’t get any significant AIF bonus.
- We’re starting to finalize plans for our open house on May 24 for admitted students. Hopefully the weather will be nicer by then!
- New this year, some of our 4th year design groups submitted 90 second videos to describe their “capstone” projects. These can be viewed on our Youtube channel. I haven’t had time to look at them all, but there are some very interesting ones, and they give a nice flavour of what some students do.
- Various other interesting items appear on our Facebook page. I highly recommend it for exploring Waterloo Engineering activities and news, since it covers much more than I have time to look at.
That’s all for now. More later, when I finish up some of the more pressing items.
Been kind of busy lately, with several active research projects, teaching courses, and admissions stuff of course. But here is a quick note about our fourth year (capstone) design projects for this year.
All engineering programs have a final year group design project, and this is the time of year when students showcase their results. For potential applicants to an engineering program, this is very useful to look at, since it can give you a sense of the type of things you might do in a program. Many of these fourth year projects are also the start of a commercialization effort by the students, so perhaps you’ll see some of these in the news in coming years.
This year, the Faculty of Engineering has made it easy to find out more about these projects, since they have created a one-stop webpage for all the programs. Have a look through some of the links for programs at that page. Not all of the programs have detailed project descriptions, but I think we’re working on it for future years. I think that the Management Engineering program has some of the best descriptions (and very interesting projects too).
Let’s start an informal contest here. Look through some of the project descriptions, and identify in the comments below which one you think is the “coolest” (if that’s a word people still use).
A revised and updated version of a post from 2013.
We just finished (February 20) processing our first round of offers for applicants who are Ontario high school students, and they have been posted in Quest. It may take a few more days for OUAC to be updated and emails to go out. Some of the processes were described in an earlier post, How to Get an Early Offer (which may be a bit outdated for 2014). But to summarize, we took the data we had at that point and made enough offers to fill up to 1/3 of our available spaces in each program (more specifically, those spaces reserved for Canadians and Permanent Residents). These are applications where we have enough data and it’s clear that they are competitive, based on previous experience. We were quite conservative this year, and gave out fewer offers than in 2013, since we want to leave lots of spaces for a fair competition in the final round in May. In part, this is because application numbers are up significantly again this year and it’s hard to distinguish fairly between applicants when there are so many with similar grades. So we think it’s better to hold off until the most complete data is available in late April. We’ll be processing some non-Ontario applicant offers in the coming weeks.
Some universities give out a lot more earlier offers, but that’s simply because they have a lot less competition for spaces and can just go ahead with whatever they have. Continue reading